@Cairnus
I had difficulty getting that module working, even on my AtomS3 Lite, the example Arduino code didn't work (and didn't even use all the connected pins). I had to use the schematic & datasheet to adapt AccelStepper to work with it. It would be nice if they moved the extra pins to I2C (and had them in the right state at startup so it actually works).

@ifantus Yeh, I'm the Mod of the communities.
They do visit the forums but they have been busy with travel.

lots of good things in feature forum!

I open mine up and cut mpu6886 out, now I use pins for anything I want without no issue

@kinonsc said in [Product] RS232 in Grove Unit Format:

https://shop.m5stack.com/products/atomic-rs232-base-w-o-atom-lite
plus
https://shop.m5stack.com/products/grove2dupont-conversion-cable-20cm-5pairs

I could also just solder a grove connector to some cheap MAX232 boards from Ali and shrink tube them...

Most of my projects deal with RS232; M5Stack makes RS485 & CAN in Grove format, it would just be nice to have RS232 in that format as well to easily plug-n-play to their MCUs.

@holofloh thank you very much, I will try to study...

Thanks for the link; however I was looking for specific information on jtag debugging... (This device)
Pete.

Indeed, there are ways to skin this cat...

Could create a label or shape in the GUI, exactly the way that you'd like to see it, then set it's color to the background color. In blockly, create a Function with a name like "SettingsMenu" that changes the colors of the settings labels and values to the visible color, and the other labels and values to the background color. Yes, that could work, but UIFlow is supposed to make programming achievable. A "Pages" block would be a lot easier for my 10 year old to comprehend than having to come up with a paging system on her own. Programatically creating shapes and text would be even harder!

M5Paper and M5Core.Ink (which I have) add another layer of creating the visuals and then sending them to the screen, partial refresh, etc... Wish "Set screen partial show" was built into the UI element, as having to figure out those coordinates is a pain.

The official way to add comments only adds them to UIFlow (they are not exported into the python code)
You can right-click any block and select "Add comment", which enables a question mark icon on the block. Clicking that icon lets you add a comment in a bubble.
(I use those comments to describe why I did something specifically in UIflow/blockly.)

The unofficial way is the code block you show. Those comments DO get exported into the python code.
(I use those comments for things like describing variables usage and (re)configuration, stuff people would still need to know when using the micropython code directly.)

It would however be wonderful to have one official "Comment block" block that could be set to work either way, and set to start expanded or collapsed, etc.
I think it would be wise to retain "Insert into python code" or not as an option, as each type has advantages in different circumstances.

UIFlow through usb is not the problem of M5Stack it is the problem of the web browser creators. Usb over web is considered a security risk and not actively supported on most browsers.

There is talk of a new desktop version coming real soon as a video of it was on Twitter

What is robocar?

Among the protocols that EAP32-Devices are known to geometry dash breeze support are PEAP, EAP-TTLS, and the certificate-based EAP-TLS....