The official way to add comments only adds them to UIFlow (they are not exported into the python code) You can right-click any block and select "Add comment", which enables a question mark icon on the block. Clicking that icon lets you add a comment in a bubble. (I use those comments to describe why I did something specifically in UIflow/blockly.) The unofficial way is the code block you show. Those comments DO get exported into the python code. (I use those comments for things like describing variables usage and (re)configuration, stuff people would still need to know when using the micropython code directly.) It would however be wonderful to have one official "Comment block" block that could be set to work either way, and set to start expanded or collapsed, etc. I think it would be wise to retain "Insert into python code" or not as an option, as each type has advantages in different circumstances.

UIFlow through usb is not the problem of M5Stack it is the problem of the web browser creators. Usb over web is considered a security risk and not actively supported on most browsers. There is talk of a new desktop version coming real soon as a video of it was on Twitter

What is robocar?

Among the protocols that EAP32-Devices are known to geometry dash breeze support are PEAP, EAP-TTLS, and the certificate-based EAP-TLS....

@annagat_nabolcat It would help to know what language are you using?

I also have generic Scared guide for direct access in Micropython here: https://www.hackster.io/AJB2K3/micro-sd-cards-with-the-m5stamps3-9d8b46

@plusulli Works well on Arduino IDE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@mtylerjr said in UIFlow usb-hid support: @ajb2k3 Can the stampS3 act as an hid device? Possibly but it may need a computer side driver. I'm actually looking into it for my M5Stamp documentation but am somewhat confused by available information. As far I am aware, there will not be any USB HID support anytime soon.

It's more than just an idea, it's a good idea. They already have it in the M5 Unified library, they just need to backport it to Core2. I filed a pull request. I hope they accept it: https://github.com/m5stack/M5Core2/pull/138 I thought that you could use the RTC::ReadReg method directly to read the bit, something like return Rtc.ReadReg(0x02) & 0x80;, but unfortunately the method is private. Hope this helps --Louis

ABS+PC = PC/ABS (Polycarbonate/Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene)