Navigation

    M5Stack Community

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    1. Home
    2. rob.biernat
    3. Best
    R
    • Continue chat with rob.biernat
    • Start new chat with rob.biernat
    • Flag Profile
    • Profile
    • Following
    • Followers
    • Blocks
    • Topics
    • Posts
    • Best
    • Groups

    Best posts made by rob.biernat

    • RE: Grove a vs grove b

      Yes I have black base.

      I really need something with at least two non i2c grove ports though. One for my one wire bus devices and the other for a mosfet module.

      The other base you mentioned just has one extra grove port.

      I know I can use jumper wires like you linked to but I really want something more permanent.

      I'm guessing I should really look at making something myself using a proto module.

      Rob

      posted in General
      R
      rob.biernat
    • RE: Grove a vs grove b

      That sounds really good. I understand rapid prototyping is a requirement but there are scenarios where you don't want to rely on a loose jumper wire during a demo etc.

      In schools etc kids are a bit rough with things so having some kind of breakout that exposes muktiple physical grove connectors for non i2c devices is a great option.

      I've ordered the m5go bottom anyway to see how it goes but I'll keep a look out for the new stuff.

      posted in General
      R
      rob.biernat
    • RE: PbHUB

      I guess I will just order some and test

      posted in General
      R
      rob.biernat
    • RE: Using native idf instead of arduino

      Has anyone been able to use the m5 stack arduino library in idf app?

      Using IDF i was able to get around the crappy ble issues that are in the arduino ble libs but i cant use the screen or buttons now.

      Thanks

      Rob

      posted in General
      R
      rob.biernat
    • RE: Using native idf instead of arduino

      Idf works fine with m5 stack for everything on the esp32 chip.

      The issue is some bright spark assumed everyone uses arduino

      posted in General
      R
      rob.biernat
    • RE: Using native idf instead of arduino

      @thrasher yeah i understand the background but 90 percent of the code should have been idf with a 10 percent layer for Arduino

      posted in General
      R
      rob.biernat
    • Using native idf instead of arduino

      Hi

      Is there anything special I need to do to use idf instead of arduino?

      I realise Arduino is simpler but to be honest the programming for me is not an issue. I have a background in C programming amongst other languages.

      The main reason I am looking at switching is because the BLE libraries appear to be so flaky that for my use case I need to get back to basics and just use idf ble support.

      Rob

      posted in General
      R
      rob.biernat